lyubo
2017-06-10 11:21:38 UTC
Hello,
I am adding new glyphs to an existing font but when I use the font (tried
using it as desktop font on Linux and in text documents with LibreOffice)
have slightly different interpretation of the shapes and at some sizes are
of different height compared to the preexisting ones.
The newly added glyphs are non-unicode and intended for usage as single
substitution local alternatives. The replacement of the glyphs when the font
is in use works fine.
The problem occurs whether I generate fonts in *.ttf or *.otf, with or
without 'autohint' option set, with or without autohinting and
autoinstructing in the *.sfd and the *.ttf/*.otf files. I tried generating
*.ttf without instructions and then using ttfautohint - same results.
/Thank you for your attention./
--
View this message in context: http://fontforge.10959.n7.nabble.com/Glyphs-not-being-properly-instructed-tp15544.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am adding new glyphs to an existing font but when I use the font (tried
using it as desktop font on Linux and in text documents with LibreOffice)
have slightly different interpretation of the shapes and at some sizes are
of different height compared to the preexisting ones.
The newly added glyphs are non-unicode and intended for usage as single
substitution local alternatives. The replacement of the glyphs when the font
is in use works fine.
The problem occurs whether I generate fonts in *.ttf or *.otf, with or
without 'autohint' option set, with or without autohinting and
autoinstructing in the *.sfd and the *.ttf/*.otf files. I tried generating
*.ttf without instructions and then using ttfautohint - same results.
/Thank you for your attention./
--
View this message in context: http://fontforge.10959.n7.nabble.com/Glyphs-not-being-properly-instructed-tp15544.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.